Acumen+giving+you+the+edge

Legal Executive

  • Print
  • Comments (5)

Readers' comments (5)

  • Until ILEX (sorry, CILEX) stop chopping and changing their names, titles and qualification processes, they will always be seen as the 3rd, and poorer, arm of the legal profession (in the profession, and more importantly outside of it). The rise of Legal Executive is down more to their comparative cost over Solicitors (and thus the restricted numbers of Training Contracts available) than anything else.

    Salaries of £35,000 might be true of 10-15 year qualified Fellows, but not newly qualified ones and many firms offer salaries not much more above £20,000 (some even less).

    As a former Legal Executive myself (now a Solictor), I would not hesitate in recommending students to aim for qaulification as a Solicitor. The longer term benefits far outweigh any initial imbalance in the comparative cost.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A balanced article. I take issue with comments made by ‘Anonymous’ 19/11/12 above. The Institute changed name to the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives precisely because it was granted a Royal Charter – a magnificent achievement that recognises the professionalism of the Institute and the opportunities it continues to offer to those offers to those, perhaps, from a ‘non-traditional’ background of a career in law. Fellows of the Institute are regarded as qualified lawyers in their own right in their chosen fields. I am qualified as a criminal law advocate; my rights of audience are identical with those held by solicitor advocates practising at the same level (non higher rights).

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • An insightful article with useful guidance. I am desperate to become a Legal Executive/solicitor and have read and re-read the Cilex web info a number of times (more than I can count) but to no avail can I afford to train up despite having the potential which was positively encouraged by a local solicitor. I have sent my CV to a number of local firms explaining my background in admin (I work full time) and how I was, through my own personal circumstances, drawn to family law with true fascination and a desire to learn. (2 year rseidence case and I was a mcKenzie friend) I feel completely stuck and have no idea how to move this forward....any advice/help would be appreciated. (30+ and worried its too late to make anything of myself despite having the potential!)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Gina, I would like to say "do not fear" but am sure someone will write a comment and put me down. Because I was lucky enough to own a property in my early 20s (through working and obtaining a mortgage), I couldn't afford to go to University and so I studied what was then Ilex. I worked full time and studied two nights a week. This was a real strain on me financially (as I self-funded) and also on my time/health. However, after taking time out to move house, get married etc I eventually finished all my studies in about 8 years. Yes I know it seems a long time but it was the only way I could do it. I have been a Member since 2008 and a Graduate since 2010 and am only just in a position where I can start practising/learning in terms of my qualifying employment. I am now also 30+ and trying to prove myself to my employer that I am worth the time and effort required by them in training me to become a Fellow. I believe I can do it and with the same determination - which you seem to have - you can do it too! Look on the website for Fellows (similar to the Find a Solicitor on the Law Society website) and see which firms they work for. This will give you an idea of who to contact/send your CV to as they already employ CILEX qualified staff. I hope I have helped you. I know people who have qualified in 4 years and have been a Fellow for years. Unfortunately, I wasn't that lucky.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Very interesting and i want to open a branch in Mauritius, so that students in Mauritius can start the course .

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

  • Print
  • Comments (5)