Chartered legal executives are often dubbed ‘the third arm of the law’. They are qualified lawyers, and to quote from the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) website: “The work of a Chartered Legal Executive is almost indistinguishable from the work of a solicitor.” The difference between the two professions is that legal executives can only do the work of a solicitor when supervised by a solicitor.
The Labour party has stated its commitment to a more diverse legal profession, criticising past governments for their lack of commitment to the cause.
Enrolments on the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives’ (CILEx) Graduate Fast-track Diploma (GFTD) have risen by 47 per cent in a single year, according to statistics released by the organisation today.
Apprenticeships offer a cost-effective alternative to the traditional route into law, providing trainees with on-the-job experience. Laura Manning weighs the pros and cons
With universities focusing on employment statistics, is it the end of the law degree as we know it?
Professional regulators and academics both love a meaty research project, and when the two combine forces it is time to sit back and watch the layers of complexity pile up like dung at a livestock show.
Adapt or die. It was with this old adage that a radical new training model was born, anticipated to change the face of legal education as we know it.
As student costs rise, part-time law courses are seeing a boom. But is the profession ready to shake off its bias and welcome the new route?